Square Dance's Surprising Second Act: How America's Folk Dance Got Cool Again

On a Thursday night in Brooklyn, 200 people under 35 are do-si-doing to a live bluegrass band. In Portland, a queer square dance club maintains a waitlist for beginners. In Seattle, a monthly fusion night pairs traditional calling with electronic beats. The unexpected revival of America's folk dance isn't coming from where you'd expect—and it's deliberately not your grandmother's square dance.

Yet this resurgence follows decades of decline. Square dance, once a staple of American physical education, suffered as school programs faced budget cuts in the 1980s and 1990s. The dance form's association with conservative political movements and aging, predominantly white demographics further alienated younger participants. By the early 2000s, many predicted its extinction.

The revival that emerged fractured into three distinct strands—each attracting different communities and redefining what square dance could become.

The Traditionalists

Some revivalists looked backward to move forward. Organizations like the Lloyd Shaw Foundation and contemporary callers including Bill Litchman and Kathy Anderson championed "traditional square dance"—the pre-1970s style featuring live music, simpler figures, and shorter, more energetic dances. This approach stripped away the elaborate tiered lesson systems and club formality that had accumulated over decades.

These traditionalists found particular success in university towns and among musicians drawn to old-time and bluegrass string bands. The Youth Traditional Song Weekend, launched in 2014, and Dare to Be Square weekends across the country have trained hundreds of young callers and dancers. Foghorn Stringband, Molsky's Mountain Drifters, and similar groups provide the revival's soundtrack—raw, acoustic, and deliberately distant from synthesized 1980s square dance records.

The Fusion Experimenters

A second strand embraces deliberate hybridization. "Techno contra" and electronic-influenced square dance events, particularly prominent in Boston and the Pacific Northwest, substitute synthesizers and drum machines for fiddles. Some callers incorporate hip-hop movement vocabulary or borrow figures from international folk dance. These events prioritize physical intensity and sensory experience over historical fidelity.

The fusion approach has attracted fitness-oriented participants who might never attend a traditional folk event. It also generates ongoing debate within the broader community about authenticity and accessibility—whether radical experimentation expands the dance's reach or dilutes its cultural meaning.

The Inclusive Organizers

Perhaps most significantly, a third strand has systematically addressed square dance's historical exclusion of marginalized communities. Portland's Rainbow Squares, founded in 2015, explicitly centers LGBTQ+ dancers. Seattle's Lake City Squares and similar clubs across the country have adopted gender-neutral calling—replacing "gents" and "ladies" with positional terms like "larks" and "ravens" or "leads" and "follows."

These inclusive clubs report substantial demand from younger participants seeking social connection outside bar and dating-app cultures. "People are exhausted by digital interaction," notes one Pacific Northwest organizer. "Square dance offers structured, consensual touch and immediate community—things that have become scarce."

Why It Matters Now

The revival's timing reflects broader cultural currents. Research on social isolation has intensified interest in structured, in-person gathering. The "analog leisure" movement—deliberate engagement with pre-digital activities—has made folk practices newly attractive. Simultaneously, renewed scholarly and popular attention to Appalachian and African American musical traditions has legitimized square dance's cultural roots.

Physical benefits persist but are rarely the primary draw. While square dance improves coordination, provides moderate cardiovascular exercise, and offers cognitive challenge through split-attention listening, participants consistently cite social connection as their motivation.

Getting Involved

Finding local square dance requires more targeted searching than the generic "weekly sessions" of decades past. Specific entry points include:

  • Contra dance organizations: Many contra communities include square dance in their programming; the Dance Flurry Network and Country Dance and Song Society maintain regional listings
  • Youth-focused weekends: Dare to Be Square, Youth Traditional Song Weekend, and similar events offer intensive introduction
  • Inclusive clubs: Rainbow Squares (Portland), Lavender Country and Folk Dancers (San Francisco), and equivalent organizations in most major cities explicitly welcome LGBTQ+ participants
  • Fusion events: Techno contra communities organize primarily through Facebook and Instagram; searching "[city name] techno contra" typically yields results

Beginner sessions rarely require partners, special footwear, or prior experience. Most organizers emphasize that "if you can walk, you can square dance"—though the learning curve steepens considerably at faster tempos and more complex figures.

What Comes Next

Whether this revival sustains depends on structural investments absent from previous generations. Caller training programs remain underdeveloped; most working callers are over 50. Affordable hall rentals have become increasingly difficult in gentrifying cities. Youth scholarships and travel funding, pioneered by organizations like the CDSS, require expansion.

What's certain is that square dance has shed significant cultural baggage and

Leave a Comment

Commenting as: Guest

Comments (0)

  1. No comments yet. Be the first to comment!