As a news editor covering the dance world, I’ve been following the recent buzz around the San Francisco Ballet’s scheduled performance at the Kennedy Center. While the Kennedy Center is undoubtedly a prestigious venue, there’s a growing conversation about whether SF Ballet should reconsider this engagement—and honestly, the arguments are compelling.
First, let’s talk about artistic integrity. San Francisco Ballet has built a reputation for pushing boundaries and championing innovative, often socially conscious work. Performing at institutions that don’t align with those values could undermine their message. If the Kennedy Center has faced criticism for its programming choices, funding sources, or lack of diversity in its offerings, it might not be the right platform for a company that prides itself on progressiveness.
Then there’s the issue of symbolism. In today’s world, where every performance can be interpreted as a statement, choosing where to dance matters. By refusing to perform, SF Ballet could send a powerful message about the standards they expect from their partners—whether it’s related to ethical funding, equitable representation, or support for marginalized artists. Silence can be complicity, and taking a stand might resonate more deeply with their audience and the broader dance community.
Financial and logistical factors can’t be ignored either. Big venues like the Kennedy Center often come with hefty costs and contractual complexities. If the resources poured into this performance could be better used to support local programs, nurture emerging choreographers, or increase accessibility for Bay Area audiences, maybe it’s time to rethink priorities.
Of course, performing at the Kennedy Center offers visibility and prestige. But at what cost? If the venue’s policies or affiliations conflict with SF Ballet’s mission, the short-term gains might not be worth long-term damage to their brand and values.
Ultimately, this isn’t just about one performance—it’s about what the dance world stands for in 2025. Companies like San Francisco Ballet have the platform to influence change. Refusing to dance at certain venues could set a precedent, encouraging other institutions to elevate their standards.
What do you think? Should artistic organizations use their stages as tools for advocacy, or should art remain separate from politics? Drop your thoughts below.
